
- #Adobe flash player for mac os x snow leopard mac os x
- #Adobe flash player for mac os x snow leopard update
- #Adobe flash player for mac os x snow leopard upgrade
- #Adobe flash player for mac os x snow leopard software
#Adobe flash player for mac os x snow leopard update
Update 1: Correction, ends up I was right in the first place.
#Adobe flash player for mac os x snow leopard mac os x
DF reader Jonathan Lundell emailed me to report that he had in fact upgraded his system version of Python to version 2.6.2 while on Mac OS X 10.5.8, and, after upgrading to Snow Leopard, he still had version 2.6.2 installed, not the Snow Leopard default version 2.6.1. Snow Leopard, the installer will give you the system standardĮnds up I chose a bad example, because this is not true.
#Adobe flash player for mac os x snow leopard upgrade
System version of Python with version 2.6.2 - when you upgrade to The same is true for anyĬomponent you manually upgrade. Yesterday, as a hypothetical example, I wrote: (Flash, and all other default items in the /Library/Internet Plug-Ins/ folder, are part of the Essentials package.) Perhaps (and this is my guess) the installer for major OS versions does not check for such things for components in the “Essentials” and “BaseSystem” installer packages.

Perhaps the bom file left by Adobe’s Flash installer is malformed. I do not know why it doesn’t work this way. In theory, the Snow Leopard installer could look at the bom for Flash and, if the installed version is greater than the version in the installer, leave it. Package receipts located in /Library/Receipts. The bill of materials for installed packages are found within the Also included are a checksum ofĮach file and information about hard links. The file’s UNIX permissions, its owner and group, its size, its time Materials, bom, contains all the files within a directory, along

The Mac OS X Installer uses a file system “bill of materials” toĭetermine which files to install, remove, or upgrade. The Mac OS X Installer system relies on “bill of materials” bom files. I do have sympathy for the argument, like Ash’s, that the installer ought not replace a newer version with an older one.Īnd there’s a good - but, alas, in my research, unanswered - technical question as to why this did not in fact work as Ash and others expected. I have no sympathy for the argument that Apple should have included an eight-day-old version of Flash in the Snow Leopard installer, or that they should have delayed the release of Snow Leopard to include it. (Forgive him for his brevity, given the constraints of Twitter.) argues that the problem is specifically the issue of the installer downgrading the version of Flash for users who manually upgraded to the latest version of Flash while they were on 10.5. Mike Ash - on Twitter here, here, here, and etc. Why Doesn’t the Snow Leopard Installer Do the Right Thing if You’ve Already Installed the Latest Version of Flash? It’s not unreasonable at all to disagree with this policy, but I think Apple is pretty happy with how it’s worked out for them so far, so don’t hold your breath waiting for it to change.
#Adobe flash player for mac os x snow leopard software
Apple’s policy regarding security issues is not to publicize them until after they’ve been addressed by software updates. Is this Flash situation such an issue? I believe not - and have seen no evidence that it is.Īs for Apple issuing a security advisory, sure. That’s exactly why GM releases aren’t rushed. Is it possible in the run-up to going GM that a serious issue could be discovered that would warrant postponing the release of a major OS update? Sure.

If postponing Snow Leopard is out-of-bounds, then IĪpple could have posted a security advisory. Release of Snow Leopard in order to coordinate with Adobe to be Gruber apparently considers the possibility of postponing the

He has the gall to ask those of us whoīut what exactly should Apple have done differently? That Apple shipped a known-vulnerable version of Adobe Flash Player John Gruber’s latest piece of Apple apologetics concerns the fact Jeffrey Czerniak answers my “What should Apple have done differently?” question: ( 9:30pm ET: See updates one and two, inline below.) More on the Snow Leopard/Old Version of Flash Brouhaha Saturday, 5 September 2009
